Definition: And after [certain] years he went down to Ahab to Samaria. And Ahab killed sheep and oxen for him in abundance, and for the people that [he had] with him, and persuaded him to go up [with him] to Ramothgilead.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 18:2. It's a bit complicated at first, but we can understand it in simpler terms. Here’s the explanation: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a very serious and troubling event that happened during King David’s reign – specifically, when he was visiting the city of Samaria. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “And after certain years he went down to Ahab…” - This means King David was traveling to Samaria. He was going to a place that had been important to him and his people for a long time. “…to Samaria.” – Samaria was a city in Israel, known for its religious significance and a powerful king named Ahab. “And Ahab killed sheep and oxen for him in abundance…” - This is the crucial part. Ahab was a very angry and powerful king. He overdid it! He slaughtered a huge amount of sheep and oxen – livestock – specifically for him. It's like he was showing off his power and wealth, but it caused immense suffering for the people. “…and for the people that he had with him, and persuaded him to go up [with him] to Ramothgilead.” - Ahab had a large group of people with him. He convinced King David to travel further – to a place called Ramothgilead. This is where things get really serious. It suggests Ahab was being incredibly selfish and demanding, leading to conflict. What’s the big takeaway? This verse points to a very difficult situation: Ahab’s excessive behavior and demands were causing problems for the people. It highlights a pattern of Ahab’s tyranny and his disregard for the well-being of others. It's a warning about the dangers of unchecked power and selfishness. In short, it describes a time when King David was visiting Samaria and Ahab became incredibly greedy, leading to conflict and suffering. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of this verse? Give you some context about the historical situation?

Definition: Then there came out a spirit, and stood before the LORD, and said, I will entice him. And the LORD said unto him, Wherewith?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from 2 Chronicles 18:20. It's a really interesting and slightly unsettling verse, and it gets to the heart of how God deals with temptation. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a spirit – an angel – that starts to try and persuade God to give in to its desires. It’s essentially a challenge to God's authority! Let's unpack it piece by piece: “Then there came out a spirit…” - This refers to an unseen being, likely a demon or an angel, that begins to actively try and influence God. “…and stood before the LORD…” – God is in charge, and this spirit is trying to get his attention. It’s speaking to Him directly. “and said, I will entice him.” - This is the crucial part. The spirit is trying to persuade God to do something he’s not comfortable with, or that might be bad for the kingdom. It's subtly suggesting a tempting offer. “And the LORD said unto him, Wherewith?” – This is where it gets really significant. God immediately intervenes and asks what the spirit wants to do. It’s a question of control and authority! What does this mean in terms of temptation? This verse speaks to the temptation to disobey God's commands, especially when it comes to things like sin or disobedience. It highlights that sometimes, our desires can lead us down a path that goes against what is right and good. Why is this important? God’s Sovereignty: It reminds us that God is in complete control of all things – including our choices and temptations. Divine Guidance: It shows us that God has a way to stop the spirit before it can cause real harm or rebellion. In short, this verse is a warning about the dangers of yielding to temptation and emphasizes God’s power to protect His people. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the significance of this passage in more detail (like its historical context)? Talk about how this story relates to other biblical themes like sin and redemption?

Definition: And he said, I will go out, and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And [the LORD] said, Thou shalt entice [him], and thou shalt also prevail: go out, and do [even] so.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 18:21. It's a really strange and complex passage, but we can understand the core idea. Here’s a simplified explanation: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a situation where someone is actively trying to deceive and undermine God’s message. It’s essentially saying this person is deliberately misleading people with lies. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “And he said, I will go out, and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.” – This part describes the action of the person. They are actively trying to spread falsehoods and twist God’s words. Think of them as deliberately contradicting or misrepresenting God's teachings. “And [the LORD] said, Thou shalt entice [him], and thou shalt also prevail: go out, and do [even] so.” – This is the crucial part. The Lord (God) is telling us to actively try to influence this person. He’s instructing us to use deception and persuasion to get them to believe something false. The phrase “do even so” means to go beyond just trying to trick them; we need to win over their beliefs with lies. What's the Big Picture? This verse is a warning about the dangers of spiritual manipulation. It suggests that those who are actively deceiving others are setting themselves up for failure. It’s like a trap – they’re trying to trick people into believing something that isn’t true, and if they succeed, they will lose their credibility and potentially face serious consequences. Important Context (Briefly): This verse is found in the Book of 2 Chronicles, which describes events leading up to the downfall of King David. It's part of a larger narrative about God’s judgment on those who are not faithful and who actively betray His word. It highlights a serious problem – someone is deliberately undermining God's message. In simpler terms: This verse warns us against being misled by someone who actively tries to trick people with lies, and it tells us we need to be vigilant in defending truth and God’s words. --- Do you want me to explain any of these concepts further? For example, would you like me to delve into: The historical context (2 Chronicles)? What "lying spirit" might mean in a spiritual sense?

Definition: Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil against thee.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from 2 Chronicles 18:22. It’s a really important and unsettling verse that points to a serious problem within the biblical community. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a situation where a prophet – someone who speaks for God – is being subtly manipulated or infected with something negative, like lies. The Lord is saying this prophet is speaking false things against the people he’s supposed to be guiding. Let's unpack it layer by layer: "Now therefore, behold..." : This is a dramatic pause, signaling a significant shift in what’s about to happen. “Now” suggests something important is about to be revealed. "...the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of these thy prophets..." : This is the core of the problem. "LORD" means God, and “lying spirit” refers to a deceptive or false voice – a way of speaking that isn't true. It’s suggesting that someone inside the prophetic community is deliberately spreading lies. "...and the LORD hath spoken evil against thee." : This is the harsh consequence. The Lord is directly accusing the people he’s supposed to be advising of wrongdoing – specifically, of being affected by this negative spirit. What does it mean in a broader context? This verse is often interpreted as a warning about: Prophet Manipulation: It highlights that prophets are not immune to influence and that they can be vulnerable to deception. Disruption of Faith: It suggests that the false words of the prophet are causing division, mistrust, and potentially even rebellion within the religious community. A Threat to God’s Word: The verse implies that the lies are undermining the message of God's truth. Important Note: It’s crucial to remember this is a difficult passage. It points to a serious crisis – a betrayal of trust and a potential threat to the divine message. It doesn’t necessarily mean everyone is involved in these lies, but rather that someone within the prophetic group has been infected with something harmful. In short: This verse describes a situation where a prophet is being manipulated by a deceptive spirit, leading to false accusations and causing trouble within the religious community. --- Do you want me to: Explain this verse in more detail? Connect it to a specific biblical story or figure? Give you a different perspective on the meaning of this passage?

Definition: Then Zedekiah the son of Chenaanah came near, and smote Micaiah upon the cheek, and said, Which way went the Spirit of the LORD from me to speak unto thee?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 18:23. It’s a really interesting and somewhat mysterious passage about a king and his prophet. Here's an explanation in simple terms: The Basic Situation: Zedekiah is the King: This verse tells us we’re talking about King Zedekiah of Judah, a powerful ruler during a time of great turmoil and division. Micaiah is the Prophet: Micaiah was a prophet – someone who spoke words on behalf of God. He was tasked with asking God for guidance and understanding. The “Smote” – A Harsh Punishment: The word "smote" means to inflict a severe punishment. Zedekiah is essentially asking Micaiah to ask God something very difficult and potentially troubling. What’s the Verse Really Saying? Zedekiah isn't really concerned with what Micaiah is asking. He's more interested in understanding how God is communicating with him. He’s essentially posing a question: “Which way did you go? What message are you sending me?” The Significance – It's About Seeking Guidance This verse speaks to the idea that God often provides guidance and direction through prophets. Sometimes, it feels like God doesn’t directly tell us what to do, but instead, He communicates His will through a prophet’s words. This verse highlights a moment of intense uncertainty and pressure on Micaiah – he was in a position where his words could have significant consequences. In essence, it's a reminder that God doesn’t always give answers immediately. Sometimes, the most important thing is to seek His guidance. Important Note: The exact meaning of this verse has been debated for centuries. There are different interpretations, but the core idea remains that it reflects a moment of profound reflection and reliance on divine guidance. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the context surrounding this verse (like when it was written)? Explore why this passage is considered significant in biblical history?

Definition: And Micaiah said, Behold, thou shalt see on that day when thou shalt go into an inner chamber to hide thyself.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 18:24. It's a bit cryptic, but it speaks about a significant moment in King David’s reign and the future. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse is telling us that David is going to face a difficult and potentially dangerous situation. He’s going to enter a private space – think of it as a hidden room – and he'll be staying there for a while. Let’s unpack it further: “And Micaiah” : This refers to a man named Micaiah, who was David’s advisor. He was a bit anxious and worried about the future. “…said…” : He was voicing his concerns. “…Behold, thou shalt see…” : This is the key part – you are going to witness something important. "...on that day when thou shalt go into an inner chamber to hide thyself.” : This means David will be secluded and hidden. He’s going to be alone and potentially vulnerable. What's the Big Picture? This verse is part of a larger narrative about the future and David’s leadership. It suggests: David was being watched: The message isn’t just about him going into a room; it's that someone is watching him. He was being tested: The situation implies David will be put through trials or challenges. It’s about God's plan: It’s not random, but part of God’s overall design for his reign and the kingdom of Israel. In short, it’s a warning and a promise. David is entering a private space to prepare for something significant that will happen later on. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse from 2 Chronicles? Give you more context about the situation David was facing in this passage?

Definition: Then the king of Israel said, Take ye Micaiah, and carry him back to Amon the governor of the city, and to Joash the king’s son;

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from 2 Chronicles 18:25. It's a bit complex, but here’s the gist in simple terms: What it’s about: This verse describes a situation where King David is setting up a team to help him oversee the rebuilding of Jerusalem after the fall of the Philistines. Let’s unpack it word by word: “Then the king of Israel…” – This tells us who is involved: King David's kingdom, specifically Israel. “…said…” - This indicates a statement being made. “…Take ye Micaiah…” – “Take” means to bring someone along. "Micaiah" was a high-ranking advisor to the king. He was chosen for this task. “…and carry him back to Amon…” – “Carry him back” means to lead him. “Amon” is the governor of the city of Ammon, which is near Jerusalem. “…and to Joash the king’s son?” – “Joash the king’s son” refers to a young son of David who would be responsible for overseeing the rebuilding efforts. So, what does this mean? Essentially, King David is sending his advisor Micaiah on a mission to: 1. Gather information: Micaiah needs to learn about the situation in Ammon, including what they need and what challenges they face while rebuilding. 2. Provide advice: He’s bringing someone with knowledge and experience to help guide the rebuilding process. In short, it's a strategic move to have someone who can provide wisdom and guidance during a crucial time of rebuilding. Important Note: This verse is often interpreted as a bit mysterious. It's not about a specific event happening right now but rather a deliberate plan for the future. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the significance of this passage in relation to David’s reign?

Definition: And say, Thus saith the king, Put this [fellow] in the prison, and feed him with bread of affliction and with water of affliction, until I return in peace.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 18:26. It's a pretty serious and dramatic statement about how to deal with someone who is causing trouble or wrongdoing. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Core Idea: This verse speaks about punishment and rehabilitation, but with a focus on long-term care. It’s saying, “Even though this person is causing problems, we will not simply punish them – we will take care of them for a long time.” Let's unpack it piece by piece: “And say, Thus saith the king…” - This establishes that this isn’t just a casual command. It’s coming from someone in a position of power (the King). It suggests this is a significant and important decision. “…Put this [fellow] in the prison…” – This means imprisoning the person. It's essentially locking them away for a period of time, likely to prevent further harm. "...and feed him with bread of affliction and with water of affliction…” - This is the crucial part. “Bread of affliction” refers to hardship, suffering, or deprivation – things that are designed to make someone miserable. "Water of affliction" represents harsh treatment, perhaps abuse, or a difficult situation. "...until I return in peace." - This means the King will continue to care for this person while they are being punished. They won’t just let them off with a simple warning; they'll keep them under observation and provide support until the King returns to restore order and peace. Overall Meaning & Interpretation: This verse is a combination of several ideas: Justice and Accountability: It emphasizes that there needs to be consequences for wrongdoing. Care and Rehabilitation: It suggests that punishment isn't just about making someone suffer, but also about helping them grow and become better. Hope for Restoration: The "return in peace" part offers hope – the King is actively working towards a resolution and restoring order to the situation. Context is Key: This verse often comes up when dealing with a traitor or someone who has been defiant. It’s a strong statement of authority, demanding a measured response that prioritizes both justice and a chance for change. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of the verse? Connect this verse to other Bible stories? Give a more detailed explanation of the symbolism behind it (like "bread of affliction")?

Definition: And Micaiah said, If thou certainly return in peace, [then] hath not the LORD spoken by me. And he said, Hearken, all ye people.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from 2 Chronicles 18:27. It’s a really interesting and somewhat unsettling part of a story about King David’s long journey in exile. Here's the explanation in simpler terms: The Basic Situation: David is exiled: David, the king of Israel, has been banished to faraway lands for many years due to his sins and choices. Micaiah is present: A man named Micaiah is with David. He’s a wise man, but he's feeling anxious and worried about the situation. Micaiah questions David: Micaiah says, “David, if you return to peace, then has the LORD spoken to me?” This means he’s asking, "Does God really speak to you now , considering you’re in exile?" What's Going On – It’s a Bit Mysterious The key part is that Micaiah doesn’t seem to be believing what he’s hearing. The phrase “he said, Hearken, all ye people” suggests something significant is happening. It means that the LORD (God) is speaking to Micaiah. Possible Interpretations – Here's where it gets interesting: This verse is often interpreted in a few ways, and there’s no single "correct" answer: 1. A Test of Faith: It could be that God is testing David's faith. He’s asking Micaiah to listen carefully, because the LORD might be revealing something important about His plan for him. 2. God's Presence in Exile: It suggests God isn't just observing from a distance. God is actively involved with David, even though he's separated from his people. 3. A Warning: It could be a warning to Micaiah – perhaps he needs to understand that the LORD’s plan for him might be different than what he expects. In essence, this verse is a moment of intense questioning and anticipation in a difficult situation. It's like a pause before something significant happens. Important Note: This passage has been interpreted in many ways throughout history. It's a classic example of how religious texts can be open to different understandings based on the context and the reader’s perspective. --- Do you want me to delve deeper into any specific aspect of this verse? For example, would you like to: Discuss the historical background of this passage? Explore the different interpretations of the verse? Explain why it's considered a significant part of biblical literature?

Definition: So the king of Israel and Jehoshaphat the king of Judah went up to Ramothgilead.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 18:28. It’s a really important part of history! Here’s what it means in simple terms: Basically, it describes a military alliance between two kingdoms: Israel: This is the kingdom that had been struggling with a long-standing enemy – the Edomites. Judah: This was a powerful kingdom located near Jerusalem, and they were facing a significant threat from the Edomites. What happened? They formed an alliance to avoid war . They decided to go to Ramothgilead. Ramothgilead is a small, fortified city on the border of Israel and Judah. It was a place where they were temporarily separated. Why did they do this? The verse says they went up there to avoid war . It’s a crucial part of understanding why they needed to put aside their differences for a short time. In essence, it's a story about peace and alliance in a time of conflict. It shows how even when enemies are facing each other, people can choose to work together for the good of everyone involved. Do you want me to explain any of these points further? For example, I could: Explain the significance of the Edomites and Judah’s struggle. Discuss what this alliance might mean for the future of Israel.